If you’re interested in knowing more about the project as a whole and the background around it, jump to project information. Otherwise, success criteria outlines exactly what is expected during the provisioning of an Android Enterprise-compatible device.
In order to validate the implementation of Android Enterprise on a device, I undertake the following:
The above provisioning tasks (with the exception of the Google Workspace enrolment currently) are documented here: Android Enterprise provisioning guides. Testing may be completed on EMM platforms other than those mentioned above for any task at any time.
Below is a list of checks undertaken for each provisioning process. For fully managed provisioning, most checks are combined under fully managed (general).
…continued under fully-managed (general)
…continued under fully-managed (general)
…continued under fully-managed (general)
…continued under fully-managed (general)
These are not “fails”, however the following I consider to either need polishing, or unsuitable for a work environment (not a finite list):
Once all tests are completed, a report will be generated to the nominated contact. This can be notes in an email or a headed PDF on request. Summarised results with a few lines of notes (where appropriate) will also be published against the device on Android Enterprise device support. Where possible, publishing of results can be postponed for the period of time I have the devices should a patch be pushed, however once the devices are returned the results will be published.
The in-depth results provided to the nominated contact will remain private, however I may request permission to use them as a reference for future website promotions (which can be granted or denied, no problem).
If the implementation is perfectly fine and requires no work, understandably the output from validating this will be minimal. In any case, normally the results (good or bad) will also be mentioned on social media as part of standard promotional posts for the Android Enterprise documentation library being built.
Retesting is always encouraged. When a device is retested, the version of the OS it originally tested against will be replaced as well as any changes updated on the supported devices page. The major version and point-release (ie 7.1, 6.0.1, 13 QPR4) of the OS tested will always be presented with the test results to ensure readers cannot assume the results apply to the device as a whole and not the particular context under which the validation was completed.
If you’re interested in having devices tested:
I’m a certified subject matter expert (SME) for Android and Android Enterprise. I’ve been working with enterprise mobile solutions for a number of years and have an in-depth knowledge of Android Enterprise so I know how an ideal implementation looks and behaves. My work has been referenced by MobileIron, Wandera, BrianMadden.com (RIP) and others. Check out my about page for examples.
Android Enterprise is popular, however not all OEMs fully support and/or implement the Android Enterprise APIs to the same standard, even those on the AER list. The goal of this project is therefore to document as many devices as possible in order to provide a free resource for organisations looking for devices validated to be fully compatible with Android Enterprise EMM deployments.
As an example:
The Motorola Moto Z and Moto Z Play both ran Android 7.0 at the time of testing, looked, felt and behaved in the exact same way, however while the Moto Z supported the full range of provisioning options, the Moto Z Play didn't provision via NFC correctly.
These types of experiences are beneficial for organisations looking to purchase devices, ensuring only those fully supported are taken into consideration (or at the very least, understanding where devices are known to fall short).
Devices listed to date have either been purchased privately or loaned to me by an OEM or reseller. How I obtain the devices has zero impact on the results, however those I purchase myself generally receive far more in-depth public reporting than those loaned to me with a nominated contact I can report my findings to.
Clearly I cannot afford to buy every device on the market for testing, so I’m hugely reliant on support from OEMS and resellers interested in having devices independently validated. To date Sony, Nokia, Huawei, CAT, BQ, Lenovo and others have been supportive of this project. I’m currently seeking to make contact with HTC, Asus, OnePlus, Nothing, and any other GMS-certified OEMs in the consumer, dedicated, or rugged space to grow the list. If you’re an OEM or reseller of Android devices, I’d accept any device, appliance or custom hardware running Android 10 or later to independently test. Devices can be returned within a week or so. Use my contact page to get in touch or email me directly.
If you’re an organisation evaluating devices for deployment and wish to have them externally tested, you are also by all means welcome to contact me to discuss this also.
In all cases there is no charge for this service; I only ask you arrange both shipping and collection to/from Newport, South Wales.
Yes, this information could be sourced elsewhere, however it is:
For more information, or to speak to me directly about Android Enterprise validation, please use my contact page, email me or give me a call on +447975537754.